Sympathy vs Empathy and the importance of memoir

Recently a well-known public figure, to many, at least, was assassinated in a public forum, horrifying onlookers including his family and the audience that included children. Controversial quotes from him are all over the internet, including his belittling of empathy as a “made-up, new age term that has caused a lot of damage.” Jesus must have been “new age” as He often felt deeply, was even deeply moved to tears enough to do a miracle of healing amidst the wailing of others (John 11:33-35). This particular public figure, though, preferred “compassion” and “sympathy.” I can’t find how he thought empathy is damaging, although too much can make you anxious and even feel depressed and helpless.

I advocate life writing and reading memoirs, articles, essays, even poems about other people’s experiences because I think it does result in empathy and understanding. Not particularly sympathy as that, to me, is a superficial emotion. Sympathetic thoughts and prayers do little to help or understand anyone. Sympathy is easy—aww, I’m sorry, and maybe you’ll send a card or bring over cookies. Compassion, like sympathy, is also standing apart and observing and feeling sad for someone but a little deeper. It can manifest as pity. It might push you to active support, or not.

Empathy is deeper, stronger, to the heart, maybe because of your own related experiences or you have a new understanding. Empathy can make you want to actively do something to help, and not just help one person. Empathy can push us to try to change things for the better, because you better understand how someone feels. When you see something unjust or tragic, even an abused animal, it’s not sympathy, it is empathy that makes you feel deeply enough to want to help somehow.

I’ve read memoirs of people suffering grief, who have lived through wars, who live with disabilities, who are adopted and struggling with emotions, who were abused, who lived in abject poverty. When you read, you become part of their story, walking alongside them. You find understanding and you become aware of lives outside your own little self. Your mind opens to new thoughts and experiences.

This world and the US are deeply troubled, and from listening to others via news and comments (if you dare read them) on social media, too many people are full of ignorance and lack of empathy, leading to cold hearts and vicious comments. Many people need to not walk in someone else’s shoes but walk beside someone to better understand circumstances different from what their limited knowledge and understanding (and perhaps closed, judgmental minds) allow. But with all the nastiness that assails us, realize that there really are more good people than mean. Let’s hope the light overcomes the darkness.

Today, Sept 21, is the International Day of Peace. “Peace cannot be achieved by force, it can only be achieved by understanding,” said Albert Einstein. Understanding can lead to empathy and action.

Unknown's avatar

About moonbridgebooks

Co-author of Cherry Blossoms in Twilight, a WWII Japan memoir of her mother's childhood; author of Poems That Come to Mind, for caregivers of dementia patients; Co-author/Editor of Battlefield Doc, a medic's memoir of combat duty during the Korean War; life writing enthusiast; loves history and culture, poetry, and cats
This entry was posted in lifewriting, relationship, sharing and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Sympathy vs Empathy and the importance of memoir

  1. Jan Morrill's avatar Jan Morrill says:

    Well-said, Linda. I like your distinction between sympathy and empathy. I have long thought that many of our problems is due to the weakening of our “empathy muscle,” and I think social media is a disease upon that muscle. I’m happy to see a lot of schools restricting smart phones in their schools. I would love to see them add exercises to certain classes like literature, history, etc., that would give the students opportunities to empathize. It’s why I write.

    • Yes, social media posts seem to encourage people who have anger management problems, instantly triggered to comment viciously and with self-righteous judgement. I liked your recent post about how words can be “Tiny Assassins.” It would be good to have high school classes in respectful discourse and required readings to expand minds to other experiences.

      Tiny Assassins

  2. Pingback: Sympathy vs. Empathy | Jan Morrill Writes

  3. Amy's avatar Amy says:

    We watched an episode last night of Professor T, a very good PBS/English show about a brilliant but autistic criminologist who helps the police solve crimes. He made a point during the episode of distinguishing empathy and compassion. His observation was that empathy can lead us to anger because we feel so much pain for others that we respond with anger whereas compassion allows us to keep our distance and not get angry. I thought that was interesting, but I am not sure it’s true. I like your distinction better.

    • That’s true that empathy can lead to anger – generally at an unjust or cruel situation inflicted on someone or some creature. Empathy gets personal and can drive us to action to try to create change for the better. Compassion like sympathy is aloof, doesn’t necessarily help or change anything, but might push us to donate funds or supplies, at least, towards say, disaster victims or an animal rescue when we see sad photos. Empathy makes you want to physically help. We can feel anger without any sympathy, compassion, or empathy when something affronts our very personal sensibilities – this is what fuels most of the hot anger we see these days. I see that many people need to expand their minds to other people’s real experiences to get some understanding and empathy to counteract their judgy, extremely touchy personal sensibilities.

Let us know what you think